WHY INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS ARE ACTING AS “PUPPETS” OF THE MANAGEMENT ?
* There are around 7000
Listed Companies and 66000 unlisted companies in India. All listed companies
and a majority of unlisted Public Limited Companies are required to have Independent
Directors on their Board as per the Companies Act, 2013 as well as in terms of
the Listing Agreement of Stock Exchanges.
*The basic intention and
spirit behind appointing the Independent Directors on the Boards of Companies
is to ensure that the operations of these entities are monitored by Independent
experts because these Companies are running on the funds invested by the
general public and the funds borrowed from the Financial Institutions and
Banks.
* If the really
"Independent" persons are appointed on the Board of these Companies,
which was the true intention and spirit of law, it would mean that there will
be no misuse and diversion of public money and funds borrowed from the Banks
and the Financial Institutions.
*Companies Act, 2013
provides a negative list of persons who could
not be appointed as Independent Directors. Apart from this list,
Promoters and Companies are free to appoint any person of their choice as
Independent Director. This freedom given to the promoters and Companies defeats
the very purpose for which provision has been made in the law for appointing
the Independent Directors.
* Since these so called
"Independent directors" are appointed by the promoters of the Companies, it is not possible that
they will discharge their duties in the "independent" manner and in
all likelihood, they will act as “Puppets” as per the wishes of the promoters
of the companies.
* It is not that the so
called “Independent” Directors, presently appointed by the Promoters of the
Companies are not competent to check the misappropriation or diversion of funds
from these Companies. They are not able to do the same as they are forced to
work under the influence of the promoters who have appointed them.
NEED FOR
"REALLY INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS":
* It is clear that
presently "Independent Directors" appointed by the listed Companies
are not really independent in the true spirit. Listed Companies are indulging
in all types of diversion of public money and even the funds borrowed from the
Government Banks and Financial Institutions. There are thousands of such cases
where Companies have diverted and misappropriated the public money and these so
called "Independent Directors" remained mute spectator of this
illegal act of the promoters. I will just give one example to show how
Companies are taking the general public and Government, both for a ride despite
there being "Independent Directors" on their Boards.
* I will try to
illustrate how general public is being cheated with the help of an example. In
the year 2006 the Deccan Aviation Limited promoted by Captain G.R. Gopinath
came out with an IPO at a hefty price of Rs.148 per share. After few months in
2007, Captain Gopinath sold the controlling stake of this Company to Vijay
Mallaya who was running an unlisted Company Kingfisher Airlines Limited.
Eventually the company
promoted by Captain Gopinath lost its existence within a period of one year and
got merged into the Kingfisher Airlines Limited. What happened thereafter, is a
sad history for general public who invested their hard earned money into the
Company. Kingfisher has already stopped its operations long time back and the
investment made by the public became zero even before Vijay Mallaya left the
country.
Retail investors who
invested Rs. 14800 in 2006 have been left with empty hands and they have no
recourse available with them to recover their lost money. Unfortunately, this
is not the isolated case. We may find thousands of such cases, if we have the
time to dig into the records of wrongdoings of the companies. Kingfisher has
not only diverted all the public money, but also owes more than Rs.7500 crores
to Banks and Financial institutions. My question is what were these so called
"Independent " Directors were doing all these years when the Company
was diverting/misappropriating the money belonging to the public and the
Government Banks and Financial Institutions ?
WHAT IS THE
SOLUTION ?
* There is an urgent need
to set up an "Authority for Appointment of Independent Directors",
which should function as an autonomous body of the Ministry of Corporate
Affairs. This Authority will discharge the following functions:
1. To maintain the Data
Bank of the experts from the different fields, who are eligible to be appointed
on the Boards of the listed Companies and Banks as per the provisions of the
Companies Act,2013.
2. After the Authority
comes into existence, promoters of the listed Companies will not be able to
appoint the Independent Directors on their own and will invariably request the
Authority to nominate a person from the Data Bank whenever there is any vacancy
of Independent Director in the Company.
3. All Independent
Directors will be appointed by the Authority and will be accountable to the
Authority only. These Directors will send a written report to the Authority
after attending the each and every Board Meeting of the Company and will list
out their observations on the discussions and decisions made in the meeting.
The Authority may prescribe a format for this "Report from the Independent
Director".
4. After receipt of the
Report from the Independent Directors, Authority will make a scrutiny of the
same to know whether it has any negative or adverse observations regarding the
operations or finances of the Company and will forward the same to SEBI or some
other regulatory body so that timely action could be taken on the findings of
the Report. If it is in the interest of the public, the Authority can make
public the observations of this Report in full or in part.
WHAT ARE THE
MAJOR BENEFITS OF APPOINTING REALLY INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WHO WILL NOT ACT AS
“PUPPETS”
1. When Directors are
appointed by the Authority and not by the Promoters, they will be able to act
in truly "Independent" manner, which is the true spirit of law and is
the need of the hour.
2. Listed Companies are
diverting and misappropriating a huge amount of public money and the funds
borrowed from Banks and Financial Institutions as illustrated above in the
Kingfisher example. Such types of misappropriations and diversions will stop to
a larger extent if there are "truly independent directors" on the
Boards of the Companies.
3. When everybody will
come to know that the Independent Directors are being appointed by some
autonomous body, the confidence and trust of the General Public as well as of
the Institutional Investors will increase manifold which will attract more
investment into the Country, giving a boost to the economy.
4. Independent Directors
will be able to monitor and check the misappropriation and diversion of the
borrowed funds from the Banks and Financial Institutions and therefore there
will be substantial decrease in the NPAs of the Bank.
5. Few years back CMD of
Syndicate Bank was caught red handed by accepting bribe from the CMDs of some
listed companies. With the appointment of Independent Directors on the Boards
of the Banks, such corrupt practices will be checked to a greater extent and
there will be significant improvement in the asset quality of the Banks.
6. Independent Directors
will be able to monitor and check the business operations of the Company and
Companies will not be able to "understate" their profits by
increasing the expenses of the Company by putting "Bogus and
Fictitious" expenses. This will increase, both direct and indirect tax
revenue for the Government and will be able to check the generation of black
money into the system.
It is hoped that sooner
or later Ministry of Corporate Affairs will have to implement these suggestions
so that Independent Directors could actually act as ‘Independent’ instead of
acting as ‘Puppets’ in the hands of Company Management.
(My this article was first published in Times of India on 9 September 2022 at the following link:
Why Independent directors are acting as ‘puppets’ of the management? (indiatimes.com)
-RAJEEV
GUPTA
Comments
Post a Comment